United States v. Gary Lee Anderson

104 F.3d 366 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Lee ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-35459. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary Lee Anderson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty plea conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Anderson contends that: (1) the government engaged in outrageous conduct; (2) his counsel was ineffective; and (3) the Drug Enforcement Administration (the "DEA") improperly retained money it received from Anderson. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo the district court's denial of Anderson's motion, Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm. 3 Anderson contends that…