Leon Sanders v. Hughes Aircraft Co. Gregory D. Wolflick & David B. Simpson Law Firm Workers Compensation Appeals Board
Opinion
Opinion
104 F.3d 366 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leon SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO.; Gregory D. Wolflick & David B. Simpson Law Firm; Workers Compensation Appeals Board, Defendants-Appellees, No. 96-55098. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leon Sanders appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action alleging violations of federal and state employment statutes as well as various constitutional provisions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion the district court's dismissal of Sander's action for Sanders's failure to amend his complaint so that it contained a "short and plain statement of [his] claim" against defendants as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). See McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1177-78 (9th Cir.1996). We may affirm on any basis…