Angley

Angley v. UTI Worldwide Inc.

Good Law
311 F. Supp. 3d 1117
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 19, 2018CASE NO. 2:14–cv–02066–CBM–ECalifornia6,927 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Marshall, J.

The matter before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion For Class Certification (the *1119 "Motion"). (Dkt. No. 95.) The Motion is fully briefed.

I. BACKGROUND

The operative complaint, filed by Lead Plaintiff Stratesis, LLC, asserts two causes of action: (1) violation of Sections 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (the "Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5 ; and (2) violation of Section 20(a) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a). (Dkt. No. 94.) This case is based on two alleged theories of securities fraud: (1) "UTi told investors that UTi's 1 View rollout [a new freight forwarding system] was going well, while its invoicing delays were in fact putting the company in mortal danger" (the "slow invoice theory"); and (2) "UTi told investors the company's internal controls over financial reporting [through its Oracle system] were functioning effectively, while they were actually suffering from a material weakness" (the "accounting problems theory"). (Dkt. No. 72.)

II. LEGAL STANDARD

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) requires that a proposed class satisfy the following four requirements for class certification: (1) numerosity; (2) commonality; (3) typicality;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.