Pulte Home Corp. v. TIG Ins. Co.

Good Law
312 F. Supp. 3d 917
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 2018Case No.: 3:16–cv–02567–H–AGSCalifornia7,356 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Huff, J.

(1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and

[Doc. Nos. 37, 38.]

(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Doc. No. 42.]

On February 8 and February 27, 2018, Plaintiff Pulte Home Corporation ("Pulte") filed two motions for partial summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 37, 38.) On March 5, 2018, Defendant TIG Insurance Company ("TIG"), the successor by merger to the American Safety Indemnity Company ("ASIC"), filed its own cross-motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 42.) The parties filed their respective opposition papers on April 2, 2018, (Doc. Nos. 48, 49, 50), and their reply briefs on April 9, 2018. (Doc. Nos. 52, 53, 54.) The Court held a hearing on the motions on April 16, 2018. Robert C. Carlson and Sharon Ann Huerta appeared for Pulte, while Robert Wayne Keaster appeared for TIG. For the reasons below, the Court denies Pulte's motions, and grants summary judgment to TIG.

Background

This diversity action presents an insurance coverage dispute wherein Pulte asserts that it qualifies as an "additional insured" under several insurance policies issued by ASIC, and that TIG is now responsible for by merger. (Doc. No. 1, Compl. ¶ 8.) In its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.