Taylor

Taylor v. United Rd. Servs., Inc.

Good Law
313 F. Supp. 3d 1161
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20181:18–cv–00330–LJO–JLTCalifornia451 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lawrenceneill, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Plaintiff Cedric Taylor's motion to remand and for an order awarding attorneys' fees and costs. On March 7, 2018, Defendant United Road Services ("URS") removed the case to this Court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (d), which provides that district courts have original jurisdiction over class actions comprising 100 or more class members in which the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million and there is minimal diversity between plaintiffs and defendants. ECF No. 1. On April 6, 2018, Plaintiff moved to remand the case to state court. ECF No. 12 ("Motion"). Defendant opposed, ECF No. 13 ("Opp."), and Plaintiff filed a reply, ECF No. 14 ("Reply"). This matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's motion to remand is GRANTED.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This is a wage-and-hour class action arising out of Plaintiff's purported employment with URS. On February 1, 2017, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Kern. That complaint defined the putative class to be "All persons who are employed or have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.