United States v. James Ernest Davis

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 9603·264 F.3d 813·2001 WL 1002160·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19600
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 200100-50238California1,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

This appeal requires us to define the limits on a district court’s discretion to depart downward under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13 because of a criminal defendant’s significantly reduced mental capacity when the court finds that the defendant’s criminal history demonstrates a need for incarceration to protect the public. We conclude that the United States Sentencing Guidelines prohibit a departure in those circumstances.

BACKGROUND

On January 30, 1998, Defendant James Ernest Davis robbed a bank in Beverly Hills, California, by handing a teller a withdrawal slip on which he had written: “This is a holdup.” After the robbery, a bank customer saw Defendant get on a bus. The customer notified the police, who arrested Defendant on the bus a few minutes later.

The January 30 robbery proved to be but one in a long string of similar robberies committed by Defendant. According to Defendant, he also had robbed banks on January 22, 24, and 27, 1998, and had made a failed attempt to rob another bank on January 22. Shortly before the 1998 robberies, Defendant had been released from custody after having served a five-year sentence for a separate bank robbery. Before that, Defendant had robbed yet…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.