Montclair Parkowners Association Hacienda Mobile Home Estates v. City of Montclair, a Municipal Opinion Corporation

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 9667·264 F.3d 829·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7826·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 5, 200199-55083California833 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether the Younger abstention doctrine requires the dismissal of a federal lawsuit brought to vindicate rights under the Takings Clause of the federal Constitution.

I

In July 1998, the City of Montclair, California, (“Montclair”) adopted Ordinance number 98-777, a rent-control provision regulating trailer parks. The ordinance prohibits a trailer park owner from increasing the rent for trailer spaces in his park upon their sale or transfer by more than the greater of three percent or the latest annual percentage increase in the consumer price index (up to eight percent). Park owners may apply, however, for administrative permits under the ordinance to increase prices for the purpose of recovering certain increased costs.

On August 17, 1998, the Montclair Parkowners Association and Hacienda Mobile Home Estates (collectively, “the Association”) brought suit in federal district court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The Association alleged that the ordinance effected an unconstitutional taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and sought declaratory and injunctive relief and just compensation for the property taken. On the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.