Metabolife International, Inc. v. Wornick

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 9651·264 F.3d 832·29 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2505·51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 235·57 Fed. R. Serv. 347
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 5, 200199-56814California13,740 words

Opinion

Opinion

264 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2001) METABOLIFE INTERNATIONAL, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SUSAN WORNICK, AN INDIVIDUAL; GEORGE BLACKBURN, AN INDIVIDUAL; HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, D/B/A WCVB-TV, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. No. 99-56814 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted May 9, 2001--Pasadena, California Filed September 5, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted] Counsel Stephen Mansfield (argued), Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellant. Steven J. Comen (argued), and J. Anthony Downs, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, Massachusetts, for defendants-appellees Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. and Susan Wornick. Robert O'Regan (argued), Burns & Levinson, Boston Massachusetts, and Gregory D. Roper, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, San Diego, California, for defendant-appellee George Blackburn. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John S. Rhoades, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. CV-99-01095JSR/RBB Before: Pamela Ann Rymer, Michael Daly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.