United States v. Real Property Located At 22 Santa Barbara Drive

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 9617·264 F.3d 860·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7833·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19661
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 5, 200199-57000California6,175 words

Opinion

Opinion

264 F.3d 860 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATEDAT 22 SANTA BARBARA DRIVE, DEFENDANT, AND ADALINE B. GARCIA; DARNELL GARCIA; MARK A. BORENSTEIN; OPINION TUTTLE & TAYLOR; OVERLAND, BERKE, WESLEY, GITS, RANDOLPHAND LEVANAS, A CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS. No. 99-57000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted June 5, 2001--Pasadena, California Filed September 5, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted] Counsel Mark A. Borenstein, Shapiro, Borenstein & Dupont, Santa Monica, California, for the claimants-appellants. John E. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. CV-89-03560-MLR Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Ferdinand F. Fernandez and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges. D. W. Nelson, Circuit Judge Opinion by Judge D.W. Nelson 1 Claimants Adaline and Darnell Garcia and their attorneys appeal a judgment of forfeiture for the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.