United States v. Timothy A. Bishop

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 9721·264 F.3d 919·2001 WL 1012720·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7867·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19696
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 200100-30044California4,741 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lay, J.

Timothy Alan Bishop was convicted of one count of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846 and one count of establishment of a methamphetamine manufacturing operation in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 856 (a)(1), 856(b), and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . He was subsequently sentenced to 188 months imprisonment. On appeal, Bishop argues that the district court erred in finding probable cause to support a search warrant for his residence. Bishop also argues that the district court erred by allowing illegally-seized evidence into evidence and that this error was not harmless. In addition, Bishop argues that his sentence violates the sentencing guidelines. For reasons to be explained, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 1, 1999, Robert Holmes was taken into custody by the police after he turned himself in on a warrant related to forgery. At the time, Holmes told the police that he had information regarding Timothy Bishop and a methamphetamine operation Bishop was running out of his home in Washougal, Washington.

Detective John Hess spoke with Holmes by phone and later at the police station regarding his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.