Maureen Little v. Windermere Relocation, Inc., a Washington Corporation

Caution
2001 Daily Journal DAR 9893·265 F.3d 903·2001 WL 1044607·81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,793·86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1188
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 200199-35668California5,024 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas, J.

Maureen Little (“Little”) appeals from an order granting summary judgment on her claims of hostile work environment and retaliation in violation of Title VII, and wrongful discharge in violation of Washington state law. Because genuine issues of material fact exist on these claims, we reverse the judgment of the district court. We affirm the dismissal of her state law claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress.

I

Taking the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as we must in evaluating the propriety of a grant of summary judgment, see Ellison v. Brady, 924 F.2d 872, 873 (9th Cir.1991), the events leading up to this lawsuit occurred as follows:

Little was employed by Windermere Relocation Services, Inc. (“Windermere”) as a Corporate Services Manager, a position that required her “to develop an ongoing business relationship and relocation contacts with corporations in order to obtain corporate clients needing relocation services for their employees.” Until she was terminated, she received only positive feedback from her supervisors. Winderm-ere’s records confirm that during the relevant period, Little had the best transaction closure record of all corporate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.