George Downing v. Abercrombie & Fitch

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 9963·265 F.3d 994·29 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2390·60 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1184·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8043
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 200100-55363California6,805 words

Opinion

Opinion

265 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001) GEORGE DOWNING, AN INDIVIDUAL; PAUL STRAUCH, AN INDIVIDUAL; RICK STEERE, AN INDIVIDUAL; RICHARD BUFFALO KEAULANA, AN INDIVIDUAL; BEN AIPA, AN INDIVIDUAL; MIKE DOYLE, AN INDIVIDUAL; JOEY CABELL, AN INDIVIDUAL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH, AN OHIO CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. Nos. 00-55363, 00-55834 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted March 7, 2001 Filed September 13, 2001 1 [Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted] 2 Brent H. Blakely, Manhattan Beach, California, for the appellants. 3 Joel McCabe Smith and David Aronoff, Leopold, Petrich & Smith, P.C., Los Angeles, California, for the appellee. 4 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. CV-99-04612-MLR 5 Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and Betty B. Fletcher, Circuit Judges, and Samuel P. King, District Judge. * Hug, Circuit Judge Opinion by Judge Hug 6 Appellants brought this diversity action against Abercrombie and Fitch ("Abercrombie") for publishing a photograph of them,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.