Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc. Institute for Fisheries Resources Oregon Natural Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Association Headwaters v. National Marine Fisheries Service, and Douglas Timber Operators Northwest Forestry Association, Defendants-Intervenors- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associationg, Inc. Institute for Fisheries Resources Oregon Natural Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Association Headwaters v. National Marine Fisheries Service, and Douglas Timber Operations Northwest Forestry Association, Defendants-Intervenors

Good Law
265 F.3d 1028
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 5, 200199-36027California4,783 words

Opinion

Opinion

265 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir. 2001) PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INC.; INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES; OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL; UMPQUA WATERSHEDS; COAST RANGE ASSOCIATION; HEADWATERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, DEFENDANT, AND DOUGLAS TIMBER OPERATORS; NORTHWEST FORESTRY ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS- APPELLANTS. PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONG, INC.; INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES; OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL; UMPQUA WATERSHEDS; COAST RANGE ASSOCIATION; HEADWATERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND DOUGLAS TIMBER OPERATIONS; NORTHWEST FORESTRY ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS. No. 99-36027, No. 99-36195 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted June 8, 2000--Seattle, Washington Submission Vacated September 15, 2000 Resubmitted May 8, 2001 Filed May 31, 2001 Corrected September 5, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Katherine Barton, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendant-appellant. Mark Rutzick, Portland, Oregon, for the defendants- intervenors-appellants. Patti Goldman,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.