Nicholas v. Wallenstein

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 9884·266 F.3d 1083·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8012·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20149
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 200199-36205California3,003 words

Opinion

Opinion

266 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 2001) TAMMY NICHOLAS; SHERYL ALLBERT; JONATHAN T. DUTCZAK; DAVID L. HARDING; ABRAHAM HINSON; VINCENT HUGER; JOAN L. ILES; MICHAEL G. LEFRANCIS; ALLISON M. DETEMPLE-MASS; FRED R. MCKINNEY; KENNETH E. MORANO; DAVID H. RICHARDSON, JR.; WENDY RUTH WARREN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ARTHUR WALLENSTEIN, DIRECTOR, KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ADULT DETENTION; ARTHUR AND JANE DOE WALLENSTEIN, A MARITAL COMMUNITY; MICHAEL GRABER AND JANE DOE GRABER, A MARITAL COMMUNITY, DEFENDANTS, CITY OF SEATTLE, A MUNICIPALITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, KING COUNTY, A LEGAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. No. 99-36205 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted August 8, 2001 Filed September 11, 2001 Sidney J. Strong, Kimberly A. Konat, Strong & Konat, P.S., Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Sandra K. Pailca, Regina S. Cahan, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Seattle, Washington, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara J. Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-00947-BJR Before: John T. Noonan, A. Wallace Tashima,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.