United States v. Mirza Ali, AKA Zulfiqar Eqbal, AKA Henry Stone

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 10641·266 F.3d 1242·2001 WL 1154988·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8580·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21268
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 2, 200100-10216California1,423 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tashima, J.

Appellant Mirza Ali (“Ali”) was convicted of one count of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (1), and one count of making a false statement to obtain a bank loan, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . He was sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment, four years of supervised release, and was ordered to pay restitution to the victim bank. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we reverse the conviction.

Both the bank fraud count and the false statement count pertain to a loan Ali obtained from the Cupertino National Bank (“CNB” or the “bank”) in May 1997. Both counts alleged that CNB was a federally insured financial institution at the time of the relevant conduct. “Proof of federally-insured status of the affected institution is, for both section 1344 and section 1014, a jurisdictional prerequisite as well as an element of the substantive crime.” United States v. Key, 76 F.3d 350, 353 (11th Cir.1996). See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 , 1344; see also 18 U.S.C. § 20 (defining “financial institution”). Ali contends that the evidence introduced, at trial is insufficient to prove this element beyond a reasonable doubt. We agree.

There is sufficient evidence to support a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.