United States v. Olumuyiwa Ola Olabanji

Bad Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 10724·268 F.3d 636·2001 WL 1167572·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8644·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21457
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 200100-50228California803 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Olumuyiwa O. Olabanji appeals the sentence imposed upon the revocation of his probation. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a), and we reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 9, 1998, Olabanji pleaded guilty to one count of forging an endorsement on a treasury check, a Class C felony under 18 U.S.C. § 510 (a)(1). The applicable sentencing range was zero to six months’ imprisonment. The district court sentenced him to no time in prison but to three years’ probation.

On February 7, 2000, the United States Probation Office obtained a bench warrant for Olabanji based on numerous alleged probation violations. On April 10, 2000, Olabanji admitted to seven Grade C probation violations and waived his right to a hearing. The applicable policy statements recommended a sentence of three to nine months’ imprisonment. The district court upwardly departed from the recommended range, stating that Olabanji had “failed miserably” to live up to the conditions of his probation and had “flat out lied” to his probation officer. Olabanji appeals the district court’s sentence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.