United States v. Daniel Clark Summers

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 10929·268 F.3d 683·2001 WL 1203132·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21766
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 200100-30083California2,468 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

Daniel Clark Summers was convicted, after a jury trial, on one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(1) & 924(e) and one count of possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun under 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 (d) & 5871. Summers appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and the district court’s jury instructions. He also challenges the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e) in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I

At approximately 10:00 p.m. on April 15, 1999, Police Officer Steven Barclift observed Summers near a Goodwill drop station in the parking lot of a grocery store in Tumwater, Washington. The Goodwill drop station was a semi-trailer, which was closed and unattended. Officer Barclift observed Summers carrying a box from the trailer to his car which was parked in front of, and at a slight angle to, the trailer. Summers’ headlights shone onto the front of the trailer. Officer Barclift drove his police car past Summers’ car and parked perpendicular to it without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.