United States v. Carlos Adelzo-Gonzalez

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 10377·268 F.3d 772·2001 WL 1131938·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8428·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20972
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 200199-50152California3,579 words

Opinion

Opinion

Illston, J.

Carlos Adelzo-Gonzalez appeals his conviction following a plea of guilty to criminal charges of hostage taking, transporting illegal aliens, and harboring illegal aliens. At issue is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Adelzo-Gonzalez’s repeated requests for appointment of substitute counsel. We conclude that the district court did not make an adequate inquiry and failed to recognize the material breakdown in trust and communication between defendant and his court-appointed attorney. Despite clear indications of an irreconcilable conflict between defendant and his attorney, the district court denied Adelzo-Gonzalez’s requests for a new attorney on three ocea- sions. We hold that this was an abuse of discretion and accordingly reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

Adelzo-Gonzalez was arrested on July 13, 1998 in Los Angeles, California, in connection with a scheme to kidnap, illegal aliens and demand ransom payments from their families. The government initially charged defendant with conspiracy to harbor illegal aliens, transporting illegal aliens, and harboring and concealing illegal aliens, but substituted more serious counts of hostage taking in a superseding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.