Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 10643·268 F.3d 882·2001 WL 1154982·81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,723·86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1456
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 2, 200199-15645California3,578 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schwarzer, J.

ORDER

The panel has voted unanimously to withdraw the Opinion filed December 29, 2000.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

OPINION

The central question before us is whether the district court erred in giving a mixed-motive instruction to the jury considering plaintiffs claim of discriminatory working conditions and wrongful discharge. We conclude that in the absence of substantial evidence of conduct or statements by the employer directly reflecting discriminatory animus, the giving of a mixed-motive instruction was reversible error.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Catharina Costa was employed by Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino (Caesars) as a warehouse worker from 1987 to 1994. She was the only woman in the bargaining unit covered by a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between Caesars and Teamsters Local 995. A long history of disciplinary infractions and suspensions culminated in her termination in 1994, following a verbal and physical altercation with a fellow worker, Herbert Gerber. While Costa was fired, Gerber, a twenty-five year employee with a good disciplinary record and no prior suspensions, received only a five-day suspension. Both employees filed grievances…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.