Humetrix, Inc., a California Corporation Bettina Experton, Doctor v. Gemplus S.C.A., a French Corporation Guy Guistini, and Marc Lassus Bruno Lassus, Doctor Inovaction S.A.R.L., a French Corporation Pierre Andrei Max Micoud, Doctor, Humetrix, Inc., a California Corporation, and Bettina Experton, Doctor v. Gemplus S.C.A., a French Corporation Marc Lassus Bruno Lassus, Doctor Guy Guistini Pierre Andrei Max Micoud, Doctor, and Inovaction S.A.R.L., a French Corporation

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 10718·268 F.3d 910·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8639·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21458
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 200199-56068California6,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

268 F.3d 910 (9th Cir. 2001) HUMETRIX, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; BETTINA EXPERTON, DOCTOR, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. GEMPLUS S.C.A., A FRENCH CORPORATION; GUY GUISTINI, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND MARC LASSUS; BRUNO LASSUS, DOCTOR; INOVACTION S.A.R.L., A FRENCH CORPORATION; PIERRE ANDREI; MAX MICOUD, DOCTOR, DEFENDANTS. HUMETRIX, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, AND BETTINA EXPERTON, DOCTOR, PLAINTIFF, v. GEMPLUS S.C.A., A FRENCH CORPORATION; MARC LASSUS; BRUNO LASSUS, DOCTOR; GUY GUISTINI; PIERRE ANDREI; MAX MICOUD, DOCTOR, DEFENDANTS, AND INOVACTION S.A.R.L., A FRENCH CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Nos. 99-56068, 00-55636 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued March 6, 2001 Submitted September 21, 2001 Filed October 4, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted] Peter W. Davis, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, California; Andrew L. Deutsch, Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, New York, New York, for the defendants-appellants. Sarah R. Wolff, Sachnoff & Weaver, Chicago, Illinois, for the plaintiffs-appellees. Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Barbara C. Biddle and Jeffrey…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.