John W. Dishman v. Unum Life Insurance Company Of America

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 11097·269 F.3d 974·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8896·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22599
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 200199-55963California7,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

269 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2001) JOHN W. DISHMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; THE ADAMS, DUQUE & HAZELTINE LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-APPELLEES. Nos. 99-55963, 99-56077 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted February 13, 2001 Filed October 17, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted] Lesley C. Green and Russell G. Petti, Bannan, Green & Frank, Los Angeles, California, for defendants/appellants Unum Life Insurance Company of America and The Adams, Duque & Hazeltine Long Term Disability Income Plan. Thomas E. Shardlow and Patricia G. Vick, Law Offices of Shardlow & Vick, Pasadena, California, for appellee/cross-appellant John Dishman. Henry Solano, Marc I. Machiz, and Marcia Bove, Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae United States. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-96-00015-JSL Before: Beezer, T.G. Nelson, and Berzon, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The Opinion filed May 8, 2001, is withdrawn. A revised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.