Jay R. Orme Julie Ann Orme v. United States of America, and Balyeat Law, P.C., as Trustee

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 11153·269 F.3d 991·2001 WL 1242297·88 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6421·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8933
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 200100-35122California2,330 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tashima, J.

The United States appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Jay R. Orme and Julie Ann Orme. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we reverse.

The Ormes had transferred real property to Clyde M. Burgess and Janice K. Burgess pursuant to a land sales contract. During the term of the contract, the United States filed a federal tax lien on the property against the Burgesses. Thereafter, the Burgesses forfeited the land sales contract and title was returned to the Ormes. The Ormes sought to quiet title to the property. The district court concluded that the forfeiture of a land sales contract was not a sale of property subject to the notice requirements of 26 U.S.C. § 7425 (b); therefore, that the federal tax lien was eliminated upon forfeiture of the land sales contract. The United States argues that, under 26 U.S.C. §§ 7425 (b) and (c)(4), the forfeiture of the land sales contract was a sale of property subject to the notice requirement and, because no notice was given, the forfeiture was subject to the federal tax lien. We agree.

BACKGROUND

The relevant facts are not in dispute. The Ormes owned a parcel of real property located in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.