Troy Swinton v. Potomac Corporation, Dba Crescent Cardboard Company, Dba crescent/u.s. Mat

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 11381·270 F.3d 794·2001 WL 1267778·82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,887·87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 65
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 200199-36147California12,402 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

This case should serve as a reminder to employers of their obligation to keep their workplaces free of discriminatory harassment. Although much of what happened here was characterized as “jokes,” neither the discrimination nor the jury verdict is a laughing matter. Troy Swinton, a worker in the shipping department of a cardboard company, was subject to repeated “jokes” by co-workers featuring use of the word “nigger” and to a continuing stream of racial slurs. He sued his former employer for racial harassment under federal and state anti-discrimination statutes, and a jury awarded him $5,612 in back pay, $30,000 for emotional distress, and $1,000,000 in punitive damages. The employer’s claims on appeal fall into three categories. First, the employer asserts that the district court’s failure to instruct the jury as to an affirmative defense under Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 , 118 S.Ct. 2257 , 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998) and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 , 118 S.Ct. 2275 , 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998), as applied to a negligence theory of employer liability, warrants a new trial. Second, it alleges a variety of evidentiary and instructional errors. Finally,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.