Pedro Rodriquez v. Bowhead Transportation Company, an Alaska Corporation

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 11503·270 F.3d 1283·2001 A.M.C. 2987·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9180·2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 23165
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 200100-35280California1,666 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

In this case, we decide whether contract language between a stevedoring company and the time charterer of a ship creates a duty for the time charterer to supervise the stevedore’s loading operation. We hold that this contract language does not impose such a duty upon the charterer, and we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Bowhead.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Appellant-Plaintiff Pedro Rodriquez (“Rodriquez”) worked as a longshoreman securing cargo onto a barge in Seattle. Rodriquez was injured on July 12, 1996, when a forklift operator, whose sight was obscured, lowered a 20,000-pound load onto Rodriquez’s foot. Rodriquez’s big toe and second toe were amputated as a result of the accident. He missed about six weeks of work. He received about $15,000 in workers’ compensation benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (1986). The parties do not dispute the details of the accident.

Rodriquez was directly employed by Barrett Business Services (“Barrett”), a temporary labor supplier. Barrett provided longshoremen to Northland Services, Inc. (“Northland”), a stevedoring company that, operated a cargo-loading…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.