Bergene v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement And Power District

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 12565·272 F.3d 1136·82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,983·87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 577·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10049
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 200199-17205California3,804 words

Opinion

Opinion

272 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2001) BRADLEY BERGENE, HUSBAND; ELIZABETH BERGENE, WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, AN AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT CREATED PURSUANT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. No. 99-17205 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted February 15, 2001 Filed December 3, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Terry F. Hall, Marton & Hall, P.A., Phoenix, Arizona, for the plaintiffs-appellants. John J. Egbert, Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-97-01911-PGR Before: Schroeder, Chief Judge, Wallace, and Tallman, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Chief Judge Schroeder; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Wallace SCHROEDER, Chief Judge: 1 Elizabeth Bergene and her husband, Bradley 1 , appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of their former employer, the Salt River Project ("SRP"), on her claims of retaliation and sex discrimination in the denial of a promotion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.