Robin Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.

Good Law
273 F.3d 1266
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 200199-17073California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

273 F.3d 1266 (9th Cir. 2001) ROBIN ZINSER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACCUFIX RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC., formerly d.b.a. as TPLC, INC., and TELECTRONICS PACING SYSTEMS, now known as TPLC HOLDINGS, INC., a Colorado corporation; PACIFIC DUNLOP LIMITED, and NUCLEUS LIMITED; NUCLEUS LIMITED, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-17073 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted Oct. 30, 2000. Filed June 15, 2001. Amended December 14, 2001, Elizabeth J. Cabraser, James M. Finberg (argued), Melanie M. Piech, and Scott P. Nealey, Leiff, Cabraser, Hiemann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, California; C. Brooks Cutter, Friedman, Callard, Cutter & Panneton, Sacramento, California; Robert Hollingsworth, Cors & Bassett, Cincinnati, Ohio, for the plaintiff-appellant. Charles F. Preuss, Thomas J. Pulliam, Jr., and Catherine W. Levin, Preuss, Walker & Shanagher, LLP, San Francisco, California; Charles P. Goodell, Jr. (argued), Richard M. Barnes, and Ian Gallacher, Goodell, Devries, Leech & Gray, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; John M. LaPlante, Gregory J. Fisher, Edson & LaPlante, Sacramento,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.