James L. Ticknor Janet Ticknor Larry Ticknor Tickco Holding, L.L.C. Ticknor Lodging Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 405·275 F.3d 1164·2002 WL 27606·51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 755·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 297
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 200200-35048California327 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

Appellees have filed a motion seeking leave to file a late cost bill. Under the circumstances presented by the motion, we grant the motion.

Under Fed. R.App. P. 39(d)(1), a party who seeks costs taxed against the opposing party must file an itemized and verified bill of costs with the Circuit Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of judgment. Pursuant to Ninth Cir. Rule 39-1.4, “[u]ntimely cost bills will be denied unless a motion showing good cause is filed with the bill.” We have strictly enforced this requirement, holding that neither a mistake in calendaring, nor negligence in office administration constitutes good cause. Mollura v. Miller, 621 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir.1980).

However, this case presents a situation under which the late filing was due to national circumstances beyond counsel’s control. Our opinion in this matter was filed by the Clerk on September 12, 2001. On September 11, 2001, the United States Secretary of Transportation and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration temporarily closed United States airspace to commercial aviation. As a consequence, Appellees’ counsel did not receive the decision until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.