In Re: Aiping Huang, Debtor, the Bank of China v. Aiping Huang

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 459·275 F.3d 1173·2002 WL 43164·38 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 269·47 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1060
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 200200-57056California1,493 words

Opinion

Opinion

Noonan, J.

Bank of China (the Bank) appeals the judgment of the district court reversing the summary judgment of the bankruptcy court in the Bank’s favor in its suit against Aiping Huang (Huang). Holding that Huang is not collaterally estopped by her settlement with the Bank from denying the Bank’s allegations of fraud, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On October 21, 1996, the Bank brought suit in the district court against SV International, Inc. (SV), ZP Tech Inc. (ZP), Ruigao Trading Inc., Jiannan Zhang, Aip-ing Huang, and Lianping Pan. The Bank noted that it was wholly owned by the government of China and that its principal place of business was Beijing. The defendants were alleged to be California corporations or permanent residents of California. Pan and Huang were said to be husband and wife and the sole directors of SV, identified as the parent of a wholly-owned Chinese subsidiary, Nantong Star-vest Data Company, Ltd. Pan and Huang were also said to be the only directors of Ruigao. Pan and Zhang, Huang’s first cousin, were alleged to be the sole owners of ZP. The Bank further alleged that Pan, Huang, and Zhang together controlled SV, ZP, 'Ruigao, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.