Dowelanco

Nathan Kimmel, Inc. Nathan Kimmel, LLC Knf Corp., Formerly Known as Kennedy Nylon Film Corp. v. Dowelanco

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 171·275 F.3d 1199·32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 106·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 172
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 7, 200299-56746California3,605 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

ORDER AND OPINION

ORDER

The Opinion filed on July 10, 2001, and reported at 255 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir.2001), is withdrawn.

The panel as constituted above has voted to grant the petition for rehearing without further oral argument and to issue a new opinion. With this decision and action, the previous opinion filed July 10, 2001, becomes inoperative, and the pending petition for rehearing en banc becomes moot. The parties, should they so choose, are at liberty to file new petitions with respect to the new opinion.

So ORDERED.

OPINION

OVERVIEW

The district court dismissed Nathan Kimmel, Inc.’s (Kimmel) complaint on the ground that its state law claims are preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 136 -136y. Kimmel appeals this decision. The district court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we AFFIRM.

DISCUSSION

1. Background

Defendant-Appellee DowElanco is the manufacturer of Vikane, a pesticide used to exterminate termites. Vikane is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and must carry an EPA-approved label. The Vikane label contains,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.