Skysign International, Inc. v. City and County of Honolulu Does 1-100

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 291·276 F.3d 1109·2002 WL 21984·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 200·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 275
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 200299-15974California3,336 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether federal law preempts a local ordinance regulating advertisements borne by aircraft.

I

Skysign International, Inc. (“Skysign”), a Hawaii corporation, was a provider of aerial advertising on the island of Oahu. Its helicopters carried lighted signs beneath their fuselages, bearing advertisements for Skysign’s clients.

At all times relevant to this appeal, Sky-sign operated under the authority of certificates of waiver issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Federal regulations prohibit the operation of “restricted category civil aircraft” in certain locations — “(1) [o]ver a densely populated area; (2) [i]n a congested airway; or (3) [n]ear a busy airport” — without a certificate of waiver from the FAA. 14 C.F.R. § 91.313 (e). The FAA issued Skysign a certificate of waiver good for about nine months on January 8, 1996, and a subsequent one-year certificate on August 22, 1996.

The two certificates waived the restrictions of 14 C.F.R. § 91.313 (e) and permitted Skysign to engage in “Night Time Aerial Advertising.” Each certificate included a standardized “Note” indicating: “This certificate constitutes a waiver of those Federal rules or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.