United States v. Enrique Gomez-Gonzalez, AKA Jorge Cholico-Gomez

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 511·277 F.3d 1108·2002 WL 47064·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 391·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 609
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 200201-10366California1,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beezer, J.

This is an appeal of incarceration imposed for violating a special condition of supervised release. Appellant is Enrique Gomez-Gonzalez, a.k.a. Jorge Cholico-Go-mez (“Cholico”) , a Mexican citizen. Choli-co was originally sentenced to two years incarceration and one year supervised release. The district court revoked Cholico’s supervised release and imposed six months incarceration after finding by a preponderance of the evidence that Cholico violated a condition of release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (e)(3). Cholico argues that § 3583(e)(3) violates the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because the statute does not permit the question whether Cholico violated the terms of his supervised release to be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I

In 1996, a grand jury indicted Cholico on one count of illegal reentry after deportation following the commission of an aggravated felony. This crime is punishable by up to 20 years imprisonment. 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b). Cholico pleaded guilty to simple illegal reentry after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.