Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Bad Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 877·278 F.3d 947·2002 WL 89074·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 639·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 920
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 200299-35711California5,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rawlinson, J.

Appellant Maureen Thomas appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social Security Administration Commissioner’s (“Commissioner’s”) decision denying Thomas’ application for Supplemental Security Income benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . See Tackett v. Apfel, 180 F.3d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir.1999). Because substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision to deny Appellant benefits, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Ms. Thomas applied for Supplemental Security Income benefits on December 7, 1993, with a protective filing date of August 11, 1993, alleging disability since August 11, 1993. She has not been gainfully employed since 1993. Ms. Thomas’ applications were denied initially and upon reconsideration. A hearing was held before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) on December 14,1995.

At the hearing, Ms. Thomas alleged disability due to back, shoulder and neck pain; carpal tunnel syndrome; difficulty concentrating; weakness and fatigue; depression; and disturbed sleep. At the time of the hearing, Ms. Thomas was 52 years old, had completed high school and had earned associate’s degrees in art. Her past relevant work is as a bartender, house cleaner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.