Harper v. United States Seafoods Lp

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 1089·278 F.3d 971·2002 A.M.C. 650·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 806·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1201
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 200201-35264California3,857 words

Opinion

Opinion

278 F.3d 971 Joe HARPER, and the class of similarly situated persons; Alex Morrow, and the class of similarly situated persons; Jason McBride, and the class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES SEAFOODS LP; Seafreeze Alaska F/V, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-35264. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 5, 2001. Filed January 29, 2002. Anthony J. Gaspich (argued), Gaspich & Williams, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellant United States Seafoods, L.P. George H. Luhrs, (argued), Seattle, WA, for plaintiffs-appellees Joe Harper and the class of similarly situated persons, et al. Jay H. Zulauf (argued), and Christopher S. McNulty, Mundt MacGregor, L.L.P., Seattle, WA, for defendant-intervenor F/T Seafreeze Alaska, and amicus curiae At-sea Processors Association. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-01610-MJP. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge. 1 This case calls for us to decide whether an admiralty statute that requires the master of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.