ESTATE OF

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 1137·279 F.3d 767·89 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 734·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 892·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1252
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 200299-70805California3,294 words

Opinion

Opinion

279 F.3d 767 ESTATE OF Emanuel TROMPETER, Deceased; Robin Carol Gonzalez Trompeter and Janet Ilene Trompeter Polachek, Co-Executors, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 99-70805. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 20, 2001. * Filed January 30, 2002. Avram Salkin (argued), Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez, P.C., Beverly Hills, CA; Robert A. Levinson, Levinson & Kaplan, Encino, CA, for petitioners-appellants. Randolph L. Hutter, Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee. Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court; David Laro, Tax Court Judge, Presiding. Tax Ct. No. 11170-95. Before FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. McKEOWN, Circuit Judge. 1 This case requires us to consider whether the Tax Court detailed its reasoning with the requisite specificity dictated by Leonard Pipeline Contractors v. Comm'r, 142 F.3d 1133, 1135-36 (9th Cir.1998). The Estate of Emanuel Trompeter and Trompeter's daughters, who are co-executors of the estate (collectively, the "Estate"), appeal from a Tax Court decision partially upholding a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.