Wilkins v. United States

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 1196·279 F.3d 782·88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 106·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 938·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1430
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 200200-55117California4,054 words

Opinion

Opinion

279 F.3d 782 Ronald G. WILKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Richard Danzig, Secretary of the Navy; Daniel T. Oliver, Vice Admiral, Chief of Naval Personnel; Anderson B. Holderby, Jr., Rear Admiral, Chief of Chaplains, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-55117. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 11, 2001. Filed January 31, 2002. Arthur A. Schulcz, Sr., Vienna, VA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Patrick K. O'Toole, United States Attorney, Peter J. Sholl, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, San Diego, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-01579-IEG(LSP). Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. McKEOWN, Circuit Judge. 1 This case arises from a military chaplain's claims that the Navy unconstitutionally administers its Chaplain Corps to prefer certain religious denominations. Ronald G. Wilkins, a non-liturgical protestant chaplain, filed a pro se complaint, requesting damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. The district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.