Jason W. Bills v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 1677·280 F.3d 1231·2002 WL 200904·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2187
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 200200-16369California2,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Jason Bills brings this diversity action against United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company (collectively “USF & G”) to recover under an insurance policy issued by USF & G to Bills’ employer, Archon, Inc. (“Archon”). Bills was injured by an uninsured motorist while flagging traffic to protect other Archon employees who were repairing a water main in the roadway. A front loader was positioned to give added protection. Bills claims that, under Arizona law, uninsured motorist (“UM”) coverage for the front loader under these circumstances is required as a part of the commercial general liability (“CGL”) portion of Archon’s Business Insurance Policy even though it was not expressly stated as a part of the coverage. If UM coverage is imputed, he claims that he is entitled to insurance payments based on his use of the front loader at the time of the accident.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of USF & G. We have jurisdiction over the appeal from the summary judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Devereaux v. Abbey, 263 F.3d 1070, 1074 (9th Cir.2001). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.