Firestone v. Southern California Gas Co.

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 1733·281 F.3d 801·2002 WL 207025·172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3261·7 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1034
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 200298-56468California730 words

Opinion

Opinion

281 F.3d 801 Samuel FIRESTONE; Calvin Miyashiro; Jack Putnam; Brian Frazen, individually and on behalf of all other present and former employees similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 98-56468. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 4, 1999. Opinion Filed July 19, 2000. Opinion on Denial of Rehearing Filed February 12, 2002. Robert A. Cantore, Gilbert & Sackman, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. David B. Reeves, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellee. William A. Reich, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Ventura, California, for the amicus curiae. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Richard A. Paez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-97-06692-RAP(Ex). Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, BEEZER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. 1 The plaintiffs have filed a Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc contending that our court's intervening en banc decision in Cramer v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., 255 F.3d 683 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc), cert. denied, ___…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.