Best Life Assurance Company of California v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 1699·281 F.3d 828·89 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 939·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1355·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2190
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 200200-71082California4,372 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue challenges the Tax Court’s determination that, because the term “unpaid losses” in Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.” or “Code”) § 816(c)(2) includes only unac-crued unpaid losses, taxpayer Best Life Assurance Company of California (“Best”) qualifies as a life insurance company under § 816(a). A qualified life insurance company is entitled to special tax treatment under the Code. We have jurisdiction under I.R.C. § 7482(a)(1), and we affirm.

I

Best is a California company that writes life insurance contracts and cancellable accident and health insurance contracts. States require insurance companies such as Best to maintain defined levels of solvency to assure the payment of future claims. In addition to their annual tax returns, in California these companies are required to file reports of their anticipated liabilities and reserves with the Insurance Department on Annual Statement Forms promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”). In its present form, the Annual Statement characterizes reserves as claims for which the insurer will become liable in the future, i.e., unaccrued claims, and it characterizes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.