United States Cellular Investment Company Of Los Angeles, Inc. v. Gte Mobilnet, Inc.

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 2007·281 F.3d 929·51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1223·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1620·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2618
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 200200-56267California5,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

281 F.3d 929 UNITED STATES CELLULAR INVESTMENT COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES, INC., Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. GTE MOBILNET, INC., erroneously sued as GTE Wireless Incorporated; Contel Cellular, Inc., erroneously sued as GTE Wireless Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees, AirTouch Cellular, Inc., AirTouch Communication, Inc., Defendants-counter-claimants-Appellees, Bell Atlantic Corporation, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee. No. 00-56267. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 5, 2001. Filed February 21, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Peter I. Ostroff, James M. Harris, Los Angeles, CA; Richard J. O'Brien, David B. Johnson, and Kyle D. Rettberg, Chicago, IL; Sidley & Austin, for appellant United States Cellular Investment Company of Los Angeles, Inc. Barbara Moses, New York, NY; William A. Molinski, and Nada I. Shamonki, Los Angeles, CA; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, for appellee GTE Wireless Incorporated. Robert M. Westberg, Morgan R. Smock, San Francisco, CA; Alan J. Droste, and Todd G. Friedland, Costa Mesa, CA; Pillsbury Winthrop LLP, for appellees AirTouch Cellular and AirTouch Communications, Inc. David C. Scheper, Marc…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.