United States v. David T. Braunstein

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 2122·281 F.3d 982·2002 WL 257492·52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 18·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1711
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 200200-10505California5,767 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

Appellant David T. Braunstein (“Braun-stein”) appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Hyde Amendment, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. Braunstein asserts that he incurred approximately $200,000 in attorney’s fees defending against sixteen federal criminal charges of wire fraud, interstate transportation of goods obtained by fraud, and money laundering. He claims that under the Hyde Amendment, the government is required to pay his attorney’s fees because the prosecution was “vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith.” We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and, as we find the prosecution was frivolous, we now reverse.

I.

FACTS and PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Braunstein’s Business Dealings With Apple Latin America

Braunstein is a businessman who bought and sold computers, often through two companies he owned, Pacific Rim Technologies Corporation and Almacén. Braun-stein maintained a computer distribution company in California and a computer retail store and refurbishing plant in Tijuana, Mexico. From September 1993 through April 1996, Braunstein bought computers from the Apple Latin America Company (“ALAC”). ALAC is a subdivision of Apple…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.