United States v. Dereck Ricardo Hoskins

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 2701·282 F.3d 772·2002 WL 356301·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2175·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3587
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 200200-50045California2,944 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

Dereck R. Hoskins was convicted for his participation in the robbery of a K Mart store in Los Angeles, California. At the time of the robbery, Hoskins had been working for only a month as a security guard at the store. He helped plan and carry out the robbery while posing as a “victim” of the armed robbery. Hoskins appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c), arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction. He also challenges the two two-level sentencing enhancements imposed under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(4)(B) and § 3B1.3. We affirm the conviction, but reverse the sentence in part because the abuse of trust enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3 is not applicable to Hoskins.

BACKGROUND

Hoskins was charged for his involvement in a single robbery of a K Mart store on November 9, 1997. Although that robbery was part of a series of related K Mart robberies that occurred between May 1997 and January 1998, only the November 9 robbery is at issue in this appeal.

At the time of the robbery, Hoskins had just completed his first month working as a security guard at a K Mart store in Los Angeles. Yvette Crystal Wade, one of Hoskins’s co-defendants and his girlfriend at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.