Richard D. Warren Elizabeth K. Warren v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 2589·282 F.3d 1119·91 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2736·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2104·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3420
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 200214924-98California3,259 words

Opinion

Opinion

282 F.3d 1119 Richard D. WARREN; Elizabeth K. Warren, Petitioners-Appellees, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant. No. 00-71217. No. 14924-98. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 5, 2002. Before BROWNING, REINHARDT, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. 1 This Court hereby appoints Professor Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of Southern California Law School to serve as amicus curiae and requests that the parties and amici submit supplemental briefs on the following issues: 2 (1) Does the Court have the authority to consider the constitutionality of IRC § 107(2)? Cf. Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 , 441 n. 7, 120 S.Ct. 2326 , 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000); United States Nat'l Bank v. Indep. Ins. Agents, 508 U.S. 439, 447-48 , 113 S.Ct. 2173 , 124 L.Ed.2d 402 (1993); Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assoc., 485 U.S. 439, 445-47 , 108 S.Ct. 1319 , 99 L.Ed.2d 534 (1988). 3 (2) If so, should the Court exercise that authority? 4 (3) Is section 107(2) constitutional under the Establishment Clause? Cf. Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1 , 109 S.Ct. 890 , 103 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989). 5 The supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.