United States v. Coy Ray Phelps

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 3123·283 F.3d 1176·2002 WL 440391·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2565·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4518
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 200299-10042, 01-10119California5,412 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

Phelps, who was found not guilty of various criminal offenses only by reason of insanity, was conditionally released with specific conditions to be monitored by the probation office. Phelps contends that the release proceedings did not comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 4243 (f), that the conditions imposed on his release were in excess of those authorized by the statute, and that his release should have been unconditional. We conclude that the release conditions imposed by the court were not in excess of those authorized by the statute, but that the failure of the release proceedings to comply with § 4243(f) requires that the release order be vacated and Phelps be rehospitalized until such time as release proceedings are instituted and conducted in accordance with § 4243(f).

I.

Factual & Procedural Background.

In 1986, a jury found Coy Ray Phelps “not guilty only by reason of insanity” of charges stemming from his possession, manufacture, and placement of pipe bombs at various locations in San Francisco. Phelps v. United States, 831 F.2d 897, 897 (9th Cir.1987). Following the jury’s verdict, the district court conducted a commit ment hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.