Douglas v. Pfingston, and United States of America v. Ronan Engineering Co. Fleming Engineering Inc., and Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Douglas v. Pfingston, AKA Seal 1, and United States of America, AKA Seal 2 v. Ronan Engineering Co., AKA Seal a Fleming Engineering Inc., AKA Seal B, and Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, AKA Mta, AKA Metro, AKA Seal C

Good Law
284 F.3d 999
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 200200-56721California2,891 words

Opinion

Opinion

284 F.3d 999 Douglas V. PFINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, and United States of America, Plaintiff, v. RONAN ENGINEERING CO.; Fleming Engineering Inc., Defendants, and Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Defendant-Appellee. Douglas V. Pfingston, aka Seal 1, Plaintiff-Appellant, and United States of America, aka Seal 2, Plaintiff, v. Ronan Engineering Co., aka Seal A; Fleming Engineering Inc., aka Seal B, Defendants, and Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, aka MTA, aka Metro, aka Seal C, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-56721. No. 00-57166. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 5, 2002. Filed March 19, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Gary R. Carlin, Long Beach, CA; John Wallace (argued), Agoura Hills, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Lloyd W. Pellman, County Counsel; Steven J. Carnevale, Assistant County Counsel; Richard P. Chastang (argued), Principal Deputy County Counsel; Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-97-6602-R. Before: O'SCANNLAIN,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.