Lipton v. Pathogenesis Corp.

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 3098·284 F.3d 1027·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2507·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4390
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 2002-99-00453-California5,628 words

Opinion

Opinion

284 F.3d 1027 David S. LIPTON, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Richard Baker, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Ray Fralovk, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Anne Shapiro, on her own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Judy May, on her own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Donald R. Gellert, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Peter Green, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Jerry Bassin, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; C Mark Williams; Paul A. Waskom; Walid Mseitif; and Gregg S. Tenser, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. PATHOGENESIS CORP.; Wilbur H. Gantz; and Alan R. Meyers, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. No. 00-35268. No. 00-35313. No. CV-99-00419-TSZ. No. CV-99-00439-TSZ. No. CV-99-00452-RSL. No. CV-99-00453-JCC. No. CV-99-00455-WLD. No. CV-99-00469-BJR. No. CV-99-00503-RSL. No. CV-99-00506-BJR. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 19, 2001. Filed March 20, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Matthew J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.