A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.

Good Law
284 F.3d 1091
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 200201-15998California2,871 words

Opinion

Opinion

284 F.3d 1091 A&M RECORDS, INC., a corporation; Geffen Records, Inc., a corporation; Interscope Records, a general partnership; Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., a corporation; MCA Records, Inc., a corporation; Atlantic Recording Corporation; Island Records, Inc., a corporation; Motown Record Company, LP, a limited partnership; Capitol Records, Inc., a corporation; La Face Records, a joint venture; BMG Music d/b/a The RCA Records Label, a general partnership; Universal Records, Inc., a corporation; Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc., a corporation; Arista Records, Inc., a corporation; Sire Records Group, Inc., a corporation; Polygram Records, Inc., a corporation; Virgin Records America, Inc., a corporation; Warner Bros. Records, Inc., a corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NAPSTER, INC., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Jerry Leiber, individually and doing business as Jerry Leiber Music; Mike Stoller, individually and doing business as Mike Stoller Music; Frank Music Corporation, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Napster, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. In re Napster, Inc., A&M Records, Inc., a corporation; Geffen Records,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.