Jones v. Williams

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 4241·286 F.3d 1159·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3347·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7131
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 200200-56929California4,175 words

Opinion

Opinion

286 F.3d 1159 Betty JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie WILLIAMS; City of Los Angeles; Michael Akana; Grady Dublin; Richard Ludwig; Chester McMillion; Edward Ortiz; Wilson Wong; Alfonso Reyes; Richard A. Brown; Richard Ginelli; Gary Clarke; Robert Holcomb; David Nila; Richard Selleh; Mark Kroecker; Michael Hillman Michael Downing, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and Daryl Gates; Arthur Daedelow; Martina Villalobos, Defendants. No. 00-56929. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 5, 2002. Filed April 18, 2002. 1 COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman & Reichmann, Venice, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. 2 Janet G. Bogigian, City Attorney's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding. 4 Before O'SCANNLAIN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and REED, Jr., * District Judge. OPINION 5 REED, District Judge. 6 This case presents a difficult question: can officers be held liable for an allegedly unlawful search when there is no direct evidence of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.