Deboer v. Pennington

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 2593·287 F.3d 748·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2102·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3421
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 200297-35363California1,334 words

Opinion

Opinion

287 F.3d 748 Dean DEBOER; Luanne DeBoer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Corrine PENNINGTON; Carol Browder; Jane Doe Douglas; Timothy Carpenter; Jane Doe Disend; Jane Doe Little; Jane Doe Ayers; John Doe Bjornson; Jane Doe Hanna; Jane Doe Gischer; Jane Doe Knutson; Jane Doe Hall; John Doe Pennington; John Doe Browder; Jane Doe Rowe, Defendants-Appellees, City of Bellingham; Tim Douglas; Lynn Carpenter; Bruce Disend; Richard Little; Bruce Ayers; Louise Bjornson; Arne Hanna; Pat Rowe; Don Gischer; Gene Knutson; Bob Hall, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. No. 97-35363. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 5, 2002. 1 On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CV-95-01402-WLD. 2 Before: CANBY and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and TAKASUGI, * Senior District Judge. 3 Order; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TASHIMA; Concurrence by Judge CANBY. ORDER 4 Following this court's decision in this matter, 1 defendant-appellant City of Bellingham ("City") petitioned for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court challenging this court's ruling on the due process claim of plaintiffs-appellees Dean DeBoer and Luanne DeBoer ("DeBoers") raising…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.