Alejandro Matus-Leva v. United States

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 3785·287 F.3d 758·2002 WL 537686·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3116·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6684
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 200201-55315California1,346 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rawlinson, J.

Petitioner Alejandro Matus-Leva (“Ma-tus-Leva”) appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Ma-tus-Leva asserts that he was a juvenile in 1998 when he pled guilty to conspiring to transport illegal aliens. Matus-Leva contends that the Juvenile Delinquency Act stripped the district court of subject matter jurisdiction. Matus-Leva challenges his 1998 conviction to eliminate its enhancement effect upon his subsequent conviction. Here, the district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 and 28 U.S.C. § 1651 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and find that the remedy of coram nobis is unavailable to Matus-Leva because he is still in custody. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s denial of Matus-Leva’s petition. BACKGROUND

On September 5, 1997, Matus-Leva was charged in a multi-defendant indictment with “transporting, harboring and concealing illegal aliens.” According to Matus-Leva, he informed the court he was a juvenile at his detention hearing and at his arraignment. The prosecution concedes that, as early as September 22, 1997, it was aware of the dispute regarding Ma-tus-Leva’s age. The prosecution, defense counsel and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.