Transmission Agency of Northern California v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Bonneville Power Administration, Pacificorp, and Portland General Electric

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 4083·287 F.3d 771·2002 WL 553845·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3238·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6882
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 200201-15449California6,051 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

The Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC) is a joint exercise of powers agency composed of over a dozen Northern and Central California municipalities. It brought suit against the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), a federal power marketing agency of the United States Department of Energy, and the defendant regional utility companies. TANC asserted claims for equitable relief and damages allegedly incurred as a result of the BPA and the other defendants constructing, and interconnecting with, an electricity intertie known as the Alturas Intertie.

The district court did not reach the merits of TANC’s claims. It dismissed the claims against the BPA for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, concluding that those claims challenged final agency action by the BPA and fell within the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ exclusive original jurisdiction. See 16 U.S.C. § 839f(e)(5). It also dismissed, as preempted under the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 791 -828c, TANC’s claims against the defendant utility companies. TANC appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I

Facts and Proceedings

Because this case comes before us on appeal from a dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.